Re: Corpora: Cross Document Coreference

From: Einat Amitay (einat@ics.mq.edu.au)
Date: Thu May 18 2000 - 02:11:36 MET DST

  • Next message: Einat Amitay: "Corpora: "The Start of a Stop List at BA" by Barbara J. Flood"

    Hi Daniel,

    Try these URLs and then follow the references they make.

    interesting:
    http://www.cs.duke.edu/~amit/acl99-wkshp.html#program1
    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~robertg/publications/papers_by_topic.html#Coreference
    Resolution
    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/~kwh/auto_papers.html
    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/gaines92integrated.html
    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/gaines95concept.html
    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/kehler97probabilistic.html
    http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/did/216478

    system:
    http://www.dcs.shef.ac.uk/research/groups/nlp/gate/

    Daniel Winchester wrote:

    > Dear All,
    >
    > I have recently undertaken a NLP PhD with the working title of
    > 'Cross-Document Coreference' in the computer science department of the
    > University of Birmingham. To get to the point, I am using the term
    > cross-document coreference to denote multiple, and often variant,
    > references to the same entity from different texts. This usage follows
    > from the handful of papers from the NLP community that outline systems
    > designed to disambiguate such references (e.g.. the work of Breck
    > Baldwin and Amit Bagga).
    >
    > Thus; in different documents, 'Clinton', 'William Clinton', 'William
    > Jefferson Clinton' etc. ,when referring to the president, could all be
    > said to 'corefer' but 'Bill Clinton', the new york policeman or
    > 'Clinton', the town in Arizona would not.
    >
    > I am aware that this 'coreference' is profoundly different from that
    > found within documents, and that the terminology itself is
    > problematic. Coreference within a discourse/text relies on
    > relationships that are intended to allow the reader to resolve any
    > ambiguity, this is obviously not the case for references in unrelated
    > texts to the same entity. Nevertheless, for the time being I will use
    > the term cross-document coreference.
    >
    > I am hoping for some help on the following:
    >
    > 1. Are there any corpora available that are marked for cross-document
    > coreference?
    >
    > I know that this is unlikely but anything where all references in
    > the corpus to the same entity are related in some way would be very
    > useful.
    >
    > 2. Does anyone know if this sort of work is being done or has been done
    > elsewhere under a different name or in a different discipline?
    >
    > It seems the sort of task that Information Retrieval (IR) would
    > be interested in, but, to date, I have found no equivalent work.
    > I'm basically after any suggestions that people might have for
    > where this is already being looked at, for other news groups that I
    > should post a query on, or for alternative disciplines and terminology
    > that might be relevant.
    >
    > Hope that you will be able to help.
    >
    > Kind Regards
    >
    > Daniel Winchester
    >
    > Research Student
    > Computer Science Dept
    > University of Birmingham

    --
    Einat Amitay
    einat@ics.mq.edu.au
    http://www.ics.mq.edu.au/~einat
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu May 18 2000 - 02:13:23 MET DST